venture capital community and its relationship with entrepreneurs. Many
of them, however, cannot be printed. For example, I once heard a VC say
to an entrepreneur: “It would be easier to build a nuclear reactor at
[UC] Berkeley than to execute on this idea.” And I once heard an
entrepreneur say of a VC: “If I ever see that guy in a parking lot, I
will speed up to hit him.” You get the idea.
The Sand Hill Road crowd does have a reputation. In an unscientific
opinion poll, the collective sentiment was probably best described by a
friend of mine this way: “Let’s just say you probably don’t want to
grab a beer with a venture guy, or want your sister to marry one.”
Yikes, I am a VC. No one wants to have a beer with me? Where did this
rap come from? I think it all starts with the clumsy poker that gets
played out in pitch meetings.
VCs are trying to get big returns for
their limited partners. That’s all. If they can save the world or cure
cancer in the process, even better — but that’s not their goal.
Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, are trying to convert their dreams
into reality. We all have deeply “vested interests” and all these
intents converge in the pitch meeting, where everyone shows their
proverbial “poker face.” (According to Joe Navarro, a former FBI counterintelligence agent and author who specializes in decoding nonverbal communication, “double-thumbs” is the “tell” for a player happy with the cards he’s seeing.)
Pitch meetings go something like this: Entrepreneurs bound into a
conference room, show their PowerPoint deck, bear their souls, ask for
a few million dollars and leave, not quite knowing where they really
stand. And so they wait. And wait. And wait. Some receive the big
checks to get their company off the ground, but more often than not,
they wait only to be rejected. Worse, they never hear anything at all.
Big checks are rare, so this scene of deafening silence is played out a
hundred times a day in the venture world.
But from what I’ve observed on my end of the table, VCs can respond
to a pitch in one of three ways — each of which is fraught with peril:
- Enthusiasm: If the VC is excited about the idea
and the prospects for the company, the entrepreneur believes the money
is sure to come. If the company is funded, hallelujah, but if the money
doesn’t come, the entrepreneur feels betrayed and led on — pins in the
proverbial VC voodoo doll.
- Criticism: When a VC tries to make recommendations
or give feedback, it can be like telling the entrepreneur the baby is
ugly. Often there is a sense that the VC, who probably doesn’t know
much about this business, just criticized the best idea since alligator
- Stoicism: If the VC doesn’t say much or react at
all, the assumption is that the VC didn’t pay attention and doesn’t
care., prompting the entrepreneur to think, “What a waste of time,
money and stress.”
It’s a quandary that every VC has to deal with. Other than handing
over a term sheet straight away, any response risks damaging the
VC-entrepreneur relationship. Can you blame us for sitting still and
Even Warren Buffett once famously said: “When the phone don’t ring,
you’ll know it’s me.” Of course, even if the phone don’t ring right
away, it doesn’t mean we’re going to say no. But saying as little as
possible is still the most efficient, and benign, option we have —which
is why it’s the response most entrepreneurs get, most often.
So, in your next pitch meeting, expect the VC poker face. We might
appear indifferent, or stoic, but don’t read too much into our
immediate reactions. (Except maybe those double thumbs.) Like the old
saying goes, “Patience is a virtue.” And champagne gets better with
time. Meanwhile, I will be careful in parking lots.